Home

LEAP

Alfred Adler

Major Concepts

Other Concepts

Resources Links Feedback

 

 

Previous Page Next Page

Feedback Files:
Expanding Adler

In this section, we'd like to consider ways to expand or extend Adler's basic thinking (see the sections on Major Concepts and Other Concepts) some 70 years after his death in 1937. I got the idea for this section from the description of a presentation in the NASAP 2007 conference catalog: "Hey! Have You Heard of any Good Ideas Since 1937? Or How to Integrate and not Aggravate: A Forum for College Professors" The idea is that Adler died in 1937, and his personal ideas stopped with him. There have been many more good ideas by Adlerians since then. A question is whether new Adlerian ideas are Adlerian...that is, do they fit his original (traditional, classical) concepts?

This section is to explore new or other ideas that may contribute to Adlerian Psychology, as well as to comment on related therapies or theories. To start things off...I'm suggesting a concept from Meadian (Dr. George Herbert Mead, Univ. of Chicago in the 1920s) Role Theory.

To take part, email me at lifecourseinst@aol.com with the heading EXPANDING ADLER. I will read, edit, and post your comments for others to see, so they can send in their comments . . . and around it goes.

TOPIC: "Role expectations and role disappointments as an explanation for conflict in role sets (marriages, parenting, etc.), a concept borrowed from Meadian Role Theory."

FROM: Bob Herrmann-Keeling, webmaster

COMMENTS: Meadian role theory posits role sets composed of two roles, called generally, "ego" (self) and "alter" (other). Specifically, the two roles have content identified by role labels, such as "parent/child," "husband/wife," "student/teacher," "boss/employee," etc. Roles are defined in part by general or cultural terms ("This, at this time in this culture, is what a husband is like...") and in part by expectations for that role by (a) the self ("This is how I define myself as a husband..." and by (b) the other ("This is how I define my partner as a husband"). In each case, role definitions include role expectations. ("Because I define my husband in these terms, which include specific behaviors and attitudes on his part, therefore I expect that he will behave accordingly.")

A problem endemic to role sets and their accompanying role definitions and expectations is that people in their roles do not always behave as we expect them to. They act differently. Such failures to behave according to role expectations leads to role disappointment on the part of the person who expects one thing but experiences something else.

For example: In a typical traditional marriage, partners expect sexual loyalty to the partnership. Unfaithfulness (having an affair, for example) by the role partner contradicts the role expectation and results in disappointment in behavior of the role partner ("Alter"). "Ego" (who is disappointed, then attempts various things to bring Alter's behaviors into line with expectations, in addition to doing some things to deal with the betrayal (e.g., screaming, crying, physical attacks, cognitive constructions such as anger, depression, etc.), and so on.

The point is that when one role partner's behavior contradicts the other partner's role expectations of that role partner, conflict and ensuing behaviors to re-balance are a result. One of the behaviors may be the disappointed partner's insistence that they couple see a lawyer about a divorce, see a marital therapist,etc.

It seems reasonable to believe that this concept from Meadian role theory could extend Adlerian psychology's thinking about couples, relationships, explanation of behaviors, etc. Any comments?

TOPIC:  

FROM:

COMMENTS